There are few things that the Britain Unbound team enjoys more in this world, than watching pro-EU activists repeat and celebrate articles that undermine their arguments. Today has been one of those days, with the publication of a Bloomberg article on the impact of Brexit on the UK economy and GDP.
What Did Bloomberg Say
Bloomberg published two separate articles on the same topic, with slightly different detail and context included between the two articles, but both focused on the same research. The first article, entitled "How the UK’s Options for Rebuilding Ties With Europe Stack Up" laid out the basic findings of the analysis by Bloomberg Economics - that it was their belief that a central estimate of a long term impact of 2.5% of GDP had been dealt by the UK leaving the EU, and that less than half of that could be recovered by getting closer to the EU again.
The real gem of these articles however, is what they say about the much-repeated NBER 8% of GDP figure - that the estimate is misleading as it uses both Ireland and the USA in the doppelganger model, both of which are unfair comparisons that provide junk modelling. When this (what must have been intentional) mistake is corrected for, and a more realistic and fair set of comparison countries used, the result was a long-term impact of 2.5% of GDP.
"Bloomberg Economics used a variety of models to calculate its central estimate of the cost to date. It found the damage was far smaller than the 6% to 8% of GDP hit set out in a recent and widely read National Bureau of Economic Research paper"
Bloomberg economics, 9th june 2026
The first article also models out the UK rejoining the EU Customs Union - and shows it adding less to long-term UK GDP than the new trade deals that the UK would have to sacrifice in order to rejoin it. So basically demonstrates that joining the EU Customs Union would be a stupid idea.
Ultimately the articles suggest that a closer relationship with the EU could generate no more than an extra £14 Billion per year in long-term GDP increases, but that this would come with a cost of membership contributions, which we can safely say with the doubling of the EU budget would be larger than any gains.
So it was likely not their intention, but the Bloomberg article succeeds in the following:
Adding further weight behind the argument that both the OBR and the NBER long-term forecasts are too high, the NBER one ridiculously so
That joining the EU Customs Union, though not actually even an option on the table, would not be worth doing
That even the most aggressive realignment would cost more than it could possibly add to the British economy
So thank you Bloomberg, for all your hard work.
Links
Bloomberg article, "Brexit: What Rolling Back Vote Would Mean For The UK Economy" - Click Here to Read
Bloomberg article, "How the UK's Options For Rebuilding Ties With The EU Stack Up" - Click Here to Read
A bumper instalment of your Unbound Daily Briefing this morning, where we cover recent polling, a surprise Brexit benefit, a split in the Labour cabinet, and the first episode of the BBC documentary
Todays stories include two different set of polls that confirm Brits support Brexit, and the impending capitulation to the EU on home fees for EU students at UK universities
Todays topics include the massive drop in rejoin support in most recent polls, rises in EU youth unemployment, and an agreement within the EU to set up Rwanda-style return hubs in third countries