EU's von der Leyen wants Canada to become the bloc's first "associate member". This could mean something or nothing…
For a start, there is no such thing as "associate membership", which is a new concept with no legal basis in the EU Treaties. Many countries already have bespoke deals with the EU on trade, or security issues, but EU officials have always resisted attempts to build formal alliances with non-member states and only offered deals on terms which are far more favourable to the EU. As Reuters reports. one EU diplomat expressed surprise at von der Leyen's proposal, saying "nobody really knows what it means". The diplomat added there were concerns that the European Commission chief "is overpromising and won't be able to deliver."
Indeed, there are plenty of obstacles to closer economic cooperation on both sides. For example, Canada won't open up markets like dairy and telecoms. Another sceptical report on Politico noted "further alignment than currently planned would create new issues around steel, cars, genetically modified crops and other substantive issues, diplomats said…"
Relations between the US and Canada are obviously strained right now, but Trump will not be President forever, and trade with the US is (and always will be) far more important to Canada.
What does this mean for "Brexit Britain"? Actually, the UK's experience with the so-called "reset" shows why Canada would be wasting its time trying to get a better deal from the EU! But this might be a win for the UK anyway. Bloomberg is reporting that "Andy Burnham has been forced to largely shelve his ambitions for a big EU reset after Brussels said it’s more interested in pursuing closer ties with Canada". If so, this would be a lucky escape.
The EU "reset" would be a disaster for the UK economy, and sovereignty. Now it's Canada's turn to find out just how bad a partner the EU can be…