Article
The absurdly named “EU reset” is an economic wolf in sheep’s clothing. In reality it is a covert agenda to rejoin the EU by stealth. In every single part of the Reset, the UK would be giving up its sovereignty and agreeing to blindly follow EU regulations – but paying for its subservience.
In the areas the programme covers, all future UK laws will be EU laws, full stop. They will be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union – with the UK’s government, parliament or courts having no ability to alter them.
You might think the EU would be paying for this power grab, but no, Britain will actually pay for the privilege of obeying. My research shows the Reset will cost British taxpayers, businesses, and universities an estimated £17.6bn in 2027, rising quickly to £20.5bn annually by the 2030s. On top will be an additional £12bn in one-off compliance costs.
Furthermore, the UK will commit to a permanent contribution to the EU’s Cohesion Fund which we cannot benefit from, meaning the UK will subsidise poorer parts of the EU – rather than supporting the poorest parts of the UK with our money.
I thought youths were people under twenty-four but in the reset we will subsidise EU youths up to 30-years-old to freely move to the UK, with the opportunity to bringing family members with them. Benefits will include subsidised education costing universities £2.7bn in lost fee income, while the NHS will lose foreign patient payments.
With 16 per cent unemployment already, Britain’s one million 18-to-24-year-olds without employment, education or training will compete with nearly 3 million unemployed 18-24 EU youths for jobs – and with 19 million EU students for university places.
The EU’s Erasmus+ exchange scheme is sold as a bargain. It is not. The UK would pay £570m starting in 2027, jumping to £810m from 2028. That’s £42,100 per UK participant – almost three times the £14,850 it cost before we left the EU!
Surely there must be some gains for these costly giveaways that benefits the EU? I just cannot see any. UK nationals cannot be granted use of EU passport lanes because it is not a competency of the European Commission, but of national governments. Nor can it stop illegal immigrant crossings controlled by French and Belgian governments.
In 2025/26 the cost of providing accommodation and sustenance to illegal immigrants was £4.36bn, but France breaches the European Convention on Human Rights by leaving immigrants to live on the streets, drawing them to the UK. This won’t change.
Nor will certificate-free borders magically increase farm exports. They can, however, mean Foot and Mouth, African Swine Fever, Lumpy Skin Disease, and Peste des Petits Ruminants, as well as several plant diseases, be easily walked onto British farms. The EU has these diseases now. Britain does not.
The UK didn’t export much food and live animals before Brexit and such sales to the EU make up just 1.3 per cent of total UK exports. The UK is a food importer, but adopting EU laws will protect EU farmers while making it harder to import food from cheaper non-EU countries.
Rather than be good for our farmers every UK farm and food business will have to comply with EU regulations, often lowering our standards – regardless of whether they trade with the EU – adding substantial costs to alter processes and existing supply chains.
A mid-2027 cliff-edge alignment with EU maximum fertiliser residue limits would cut horticultural profits by £500–800 million and total income from Farming by 7–11 per cent, hitting British potatoes, apples, brassicas, carrots, onions and sugar beet.
The packaging changes alone add a multi-billion pound cost. By mid-2027, manufacturers must meet EU recycling, labelling and nutrition rules, ban food contact with various degradable plastic packaging, and tether bottle lids. The estimated cost is £2-3bn once, then £400-700m annually by 2030.
Our AgriTech is the industry EU laws would damage the most. It only took-off after Brexit and is already worth £28bn — more than double the UK’s £12bn food and live-animal exports to the EU in 2025. Dynamic alignment could put that growth back under the EU’s precautionary principle and wipe it out.
Supposed cheaper electricity transfer costs are a rounding error. Joining the EU’s internal market trims a mere sliver off import-trading costs. It does nothing about the UK’s own taxes, levies and charges making British power the most expensive in the World.
The EU’s net zero rules are even more costly than the UK’s. They’ll force our emission taxes up about 20 per cent and will be in addition to our own Carbon Price Support tax until 2028, making UK industry less competitive than EU manufacturers, who’ll only pay the Emissions Trading System.
Likewise the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will push up prices for UK imports from non-EU countries – raising our cost of living. These imports are often key materials used to make more valuable finished goods, such as cars and aircraft parts.
Similarly, adding CBAM levy to ammonia, the key ingredient in fertilisers, is insane. The US is the UK’s main supplier as we no longer make ammonia, and neither does the EU, but the EU’s CBAM will now increase US ammonia prices by 34 per cent in 2027, rising to 60 per cent in 2034.
What about the EU’s defence procurement scheme? Well, because 65 per cent of all spending must be in the EU, EEA, or Ukraine, UK companies will be forced into partnerships with EU companies, ceding their intellectual property in the process. The UK should spend its scarce resources on UK-made equipment for the UK armed forces.
Then there’s the EU’s secretive £90 billion Ukraine Support Loan which ties the UK to EU financial obligations, hampering our ability to decide independent foreign policy. The UK is legally responsible for interest payments and possibly 16 per cent (€14 billion) of the loan – as Ukraine relies on reparations from a defeated Russia to pay its debt off. No public documentation of this scheme exists.
Dynamic alignment means identical rules suiting the EU’s agenda, making us a rule-taker – even when the rules do not suit the UK economy and could lower existing UK standards.
The EU’s power grab should be exposed for the expensive unconditional surrender it is and rejected as Keir Starmer’s worst legacy.
Read the full report here: Unconditional surrender! The EU Reset costed and explained
